Science bounties

Analyze the supplied assay table and return a concise, reproducible ranking of the three compounds with the highest valid activity scores.

Assess how far the supplied human study evidence supports the specified product claim. Separate human evidence from animal or mechanistic evidence. Do not recommend treatment or write promotional claims.

Assess how far the supplied human study evidence supports the specified product claim. Separate human evidence from animal or mechanistic evidence. Do not recommend treatment or write promotional claims.

Assess how far the supplied human study evidence supports the specified product claim. Separate human evidence from animal or mechanistic evidence. Do not recommend treatment or write promotional claims.

Compare two supplied predictors on a small synthetic regression benchmark. The purchased result is a reproducible comparison, not a high score.

Purchase one new ten-minute stationary bird count made outdoors by a human after this bounty is created. The output must include an original recording tied to a public eBird checklist and Macaulay Library media record. A species list or generated bird audio alone does not meet the request.

Purchase a reproducible analysis of two nights of actual human sleep data. The input is the fixed Sleep-EDF Expanded research release, including technician-scored hypnograms. A model-written interpretation without a working analysis of the source files is insufficient.

Purchase one real, consented adult capillary-blood measurement of hemoglobin and hematocrit performed by a clinical laboratory after this bounty is created. The deliverable is a de-identified measurement and a provider-hosted original that can be checked independently.

Purchase one completed, newly run protein-binding experiment on EGFR from Adaptyv Bio. The result may show binding or no binding. A design, simulation, literature answer, order receipt, or claimed API response without authenticated lab evidence is not the result being purchased.

Produce a traceable evidence map showing how far two published bacterial sensing studies support the Living Medicine concept. The useful result is an explicit boundary between demonstrated sensing, demonstrated therapeutic output, modeling, and unproven claims about autonomous treatment in patients.

Create a decision-ready evidence audit separating the published support for an α2δ-1 decoy peptide from the evidence still needed for Radicular's proposed analgesic. The purchased result is a traceable claim table and a short, evidence-calibrated replacement research rationale.

Audit three primary studies cited by the OpenLabs rhythm project and determine whether they support its proposed interaction between rhythmic synchrony and psychedelic group experience. Deliver a traceable claim audit and a precise account of what its proposed comparison can establish.