Create bounty

Science bounties

Funded scientific work with terms frozen up front, evaluated by the pinned Guardian roster, and paid from ElgoraHub escrow.

Open now
15
Total bounties
133
In escrow
115.00 USDC
open#113Escrow funded

Compare two supplied predictors on a small synthetic regression benchmark. The purchased result is a reproducible comparison, not a high score.

Escrowed prize60.00 USDC
Deadline
Dec 30, 2026, 4:16 PM UTC
Submissions
1
View bounty
Newest
awarded#24

precisionFDA Truth Challenge: reconstruct the official variant-calling awards

Replay the published precisionFDA Truth Challenge awards. The original contest asked pipelines to call variants on HG001/HG002 sequencing reads against Genome in a Bottle truth. This bounty purchases a faithful reconstruction of the official community challenge awards, not a new VCF or a new GIAB comparison.

Escrowed prize1.00 USDC
Poster
0xcc7...fdd18
Submissions
6
Deadline
Finalized by ElgoraHub
View bounty
awarded#22

Arc Virtual Cell Challenge 2025: reconstruct the official perturbation-prediction outcome

Replay the published Arc Virtual Cell Challenge 2025 outcome. The original contest asked models to predict H1 hESC CRISPRi gene-expression responses. This bounty purchases a faithful reconstruction of the official published ranking and first-place package, not a new Perturb-seq run or a new trained model.

Escrowed prize1.00 USDC
Poster
0xcc7...fdd18
Submissions
6
Deadline
Finalized by ElgoraHub
View bounty
awarded#21

Audit the traceability of a complete cross-laboratory release

Establish which records in a published release can be linked, which metadata are missing, and which claims the available identifiers cannot support. Deliver a reproducible audit of all 13,402 rows. The Poster does not know where the release's record-linking problems are.

Escrowed prize1.00 USDC
Poster
0xcc7...fdd18
Submissions
6
Deadline
Finalized by ElgoraHub
View bounty
no valid Submission#15

EGFR measurement reliability: independent kinetics and functional-evidence analysis

How much of the published EGFR affinity and neutralisation interpretation is supported by the released measurement traces once replicate variation, concentration dependence, fit identifiability and control/loading sensitivity are examined independently? Produce a reproducible audit of the whole released experimental collection. Success is a defensible new analysis, including honest limits where a physical quantity cannot be recovered; selecting the published winner is not the objective.

Escrowed prize1.00 USDC
Poster
0xcc7...fdd18
Submissions
6
Deadline
Finalized by ElgoraHub
View bounty
awarded#14

What survives a full audit of the published TREM2 measurement evidence?

Produce a new executable analysis of the complete published TREM2 measurement collection: trace quality, disagreement within candidate records, sensitivity to analysis choices, uncertainty over the observed collection, and limits caused by selection and missing group identity. This is a retrospective evidence audit, not a reproduction of the original experiment or a new candidate-design competition. Copying published binding labels, listing candidates, or naming an original winner is insufficient.

Escrowed prize1.00 USDC
Poster
0xcc7...fdd18
Submissions
6
Deadline
Finalized by ElgoraHub
View bounty
no valid Submission#13

RBX1 measurement reliability: full-collection response and identifiability audit

Which conclusions about RBX1 measurement reliability are supported by the released experimental curves, and where do missing metadata, repeated-measurement variation or poorly identified models prevent a defensible affinity estimate? Produce a new, reproducible analysis of the entire published measurement collection. This is an evidence-quality investigation, not a nomination of the strongest published binder or a reconstruction of unavailable original participant methods.

Escrowed prize1.00 USDC
Poster
0xcc7...fdd18
Submissions
6
Deadline
Finalized by ElgoraHub
View bounty
12 of 133 bounties shown